Estimating Efficiency Is Not About Being Faster. It’s About Wasting Less Effort.

Effort isn’t the problem

Most SMB civil contractors are not short on effort. They are short on time.

Common time sinks:

• • Chasing bid tabs through open records requests (FOIA/OPRA), phone calls, or bid openings
  • Digging through PDFs to find one pay item price
  • Rebuilding unit prices from scratch when the market moved
  • Bidding jobs that were never winnable at your margin

If you can remove even one of those, you get time back without changing your craft.

The “market layer” (what most estimating stacks are missing)

Your estimating tools are built for internal costs. They are not built to answer:

• • What do comparable items actually go for in this county/state?
  • How tight is the market on this type of work right now?
  • Are we high because our costs are high… or because the market moved?

That external layer does not replace your estimate. It validates it.

That external layer does not replace your estimate. It validates it.

A repeatable workflow that respects the way contractors actually work

If you are running Excel, HeavyBid, Bid2Win, or a hybrid workflow, the goal is not to rip anything out. Use this sequence:

1. 1. Build your estimate normally (your quantities, your production, your subs).
   2. Pull comparables (job-level and item-level) for the handful of items that move the job.
   3. Do a quick market gut check before you submit:

• • • Are we inside the likely range?
    • Are we leaving margin behind?
    • Are we about to waste two weeks on an unwinnable pursuit?

1. 4. After bid day, record the result:

• • • Did we win close?
    • Did we lose close?
    • Did we win too cheap?

Over time, your estimating gets sharper because your feedback loop is real.

Over time, your estimating gets sharper because your feedback loop is real.

How to get bid tabs faster (the practical way)

Bid tabs are public record. The friction is that they are scattered.

A simple approach:

• • Build a list of the agencies you bid most (10-30)
  • Use a single open records request template you can reuse
  • Centralize results in one folder with a naming convention
  • Capture at least: project name, letting date, location, top bidders, and a PDF of the tab

This works, but it still has two hard limits:

• • It only covers a fraction of the market
  • It is slow, inconsistent, and hard to analyze at scale

That is why most teams end up back in gut-check mode.

The 15-minute bid-day gut check

Before you submit, ask four questions:

1. 1. Are we in the market range on the 10 pay items that move the bid total?
   2. Is the market unusually crowded here (pricing pressure)?
   3. If we win, are we likely to win close (or are we donating margin)?
   4. If we lose, are we likely to lose close (a small tweak could flip it)?

This takes discipline, not more hours.

Adoption with tech-averse teams (what actually works)

A lot of older owners and senior estimators do not want “another system.” Fair.

The way to roll this out is simple:

• • Start with one person (champion): owner, chief estimator, or an estimator who already collects bid tabs.
  • Use it only for research at first (no process change). Example: “find 3 comps and 5 pay item ranges.”
  • Review together on two bids. Show one missed win and one margin giveaway.
  • Then expand. Once the team sees it saves time and avoids bad bids, it sticks.

COO and co-founder Mark Zurada explains how PinPoint doesn’t replace estimators — it backs them up.

Where PinPoint fits

PinPoint is designed for the parts of estimating that are inefficient and hard to do manually:

• • Bid tabs made searchable with Historical Bid Search
  • Quick item lookup for hard-to-price items on Bid Intelligence
  • Market-informed range and likely winning number through Bid Intelligence

If you only do one thing, start with bid history search. It immediately reduces friction.

If you only do one thing, start with bid history search. It immediately reduces friction.

Learn how to access 10+ years of bid tabs, all in one place with Historical Bid Search.